Protesting For AI Regulation
Source: LessWrong ·
There was an AI protest day today, with parallel protests around the world, and our family went to the Boston one: I'm not really a protest person : normally I share my views in writing . But while there's been a lot of writing on the internet about the risk that AI gets us all killed (some of it from me ), this can't be an internet-only thing. Way too few people are taking seriously the risk that OpenAI, Anthropic, and others are rapidly building something that could actually cause human extinction. A protest is a literal demonstration that people care, and it expands visibility to the genera
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Protesting For AI Regulation?
Protesting For AI Regulation is a article discovery curated from LessWrong. There was an AI protest day today, with parallel protests around the world, and our family went to the Boston one: I'm not really a protest person : normally I share my views in…
How can I access or experience this?
You can experience this content directly on its original host (LessWrong) by clicking the "Open Original" button.
Where does this content come from?
Curated from LessWrong by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.
More like this
All Culture & ideas discoveries →A digital security checklist for the AI age
We’re going to see huge, foundational cybersecurity attacks given the rapid rise in AI capabilities. Having worked in hostile environments, I’ve thought a lot about physical and digital security over the years. While you may not be personally targeted, or doing dangerous work, your data is undoubtedly leaked somewhere, and the digital providers you use—for email, banking, social media, etc.—are more and more likely to get hacked. Discuss
Wargames inform present policy, not future incident response
In January 2024, Ryan Greenblatt and Buck Shlegeris posted " Catching AIs red-handed ." This post got on "Best of LessWrong" in 2025, and in December of last year Buck Shlegeris commented on it explaining that he was disappointed it did not lead to more follow-up research. I upvoted the post at the time of the review and think it is representative of the kind of concrete analysis the community values. As it happens, it turned out to be remarkably prescient and near-term-relevant for a theorypost: just this August 2026 we, in fact, got to see what happens when AI companies "catch their AIs red-
Trying to understand that compute multiplier graph
Anthropic's IPO roadshow video has a graph. It shows four models; I think dot 1 = Claude 3.5, dot 2 = Claude 4, dot 3 = Mythos, arrowhead = unreleased model. The graph provided doesn't have any numbers on the Y axis. In this post I'll explain why I think the Y axis lines most likely represent a 10x jump each, and so the point at the end of the graph represents about a 30000x CM (i.e. Anthropic can currently pretrain models at the same quality with 1/30000th of the compute it needed in 2024). I'm pretty unsure about this though and it could plausibly be much higher or much lower. Keep in mind t
Visualizing the Difficulty of AI Alignment
Epistemic status: Low, but I hope to be wrong in interesting ways As a non-computer scientist-scientist [1] I find it hard to think about the varying perspectives on Artificial Intelligence alignment difficulty. To make this more intuitive I invoke the 3D surface of a fitness landscape like structure as a visual representation. [2] The AI Safety Landscape AI safety is thought to be largely pre-paradigmatic, although of the current views AI safety perspectives there are noticeable camps, and within each there is wide variation. It is also rapidly evolving as more information comes out about the
Twenty Minutes Into the Future: On Launching “Terminal Values”
Cross-posted from Oblomovka . It’s 4AM on a Monday morning. In a few hours, I’m supposed to be launching a new digital rights organisation at the Cypherpunk Congress , in Mumbai, India. I’m still in my pyjamas in San Francisco. This part, at least, was somewhat planned. I told Mykola Siusko and Becca Creamer , the organisers, I had an important announcement, which I’d do by a remote video link. Everything else is a little improvised. For a start, I sort of hate video presentations at conferences. It’s always a challenge to keep the energy up in a live audience when they pull up the giant scree
Solar power, from futurist speculation to business plan
One mode of futurism is estimating the limits of a technology, without regard to what's currently feasible. Whether this is of any relevance to your own generation is another question. Let's consider solar power. Ignoring current technology, it's easy to put a number on the maximum power output. The solar power at the Earth's distance from the sun is called the solar constant . It is 1.36 kW/m² . The power on a square meter of the ground is less than that, because of the angle of incidence as well as the atmosphere. The solar constant hasn't changed and technology has, so it's interesting to s