跳到内容
onsuggest
登录
文章 en

How does programming language affect token efficiency and correctness?

来源: Dan Luu ·

This somewhat widely cited post (I keep seeing it cited, anyway) suggests that dynamic languages and/or languages that represent things more concisely are more token efficient. It seems to be cited enough that LLM search results agree. For example, when I searched for "dynamic vs static language token cost" (no quotes), Google's AI summary opened with Dynamically typed languages generally have a lower LLM token cost than traditional statically typed languages because omitting explicit type declarations makes the code more compact. Google's AI cited the same post, which suggests that some conci

键盘快捷键

上一条发现
←P
下一条发现
→N
喜欢
L
不适合我
X
保存
S
显示此帮助
?
关闭
Esc

快捷键在发现页面上有效。