Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle)
Source: Hacker News ·
Comments
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle) ?
Petered (what happens after the Peter Principle) is a site web discovery curated from Hacker News. Comments
Comment puis-je y accéder ou l'essayer ?
You can experience this content directly on its original host (Hacker News) by clicking the "Open Original" button.
D'où vient ce contenu ?
Curated from Hacker News by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.
Dans le même esprit
Toutes les découvertes Communautés →Marked Down for Being Right: Claude Fable 5.2 vs Opus 5.5 on Real Code
Claude Fable 5.2 costs twice as much per token as Opus 5.5. On 52 real tasks from a production monorepo, my tests scored it level or behind. Then I read the failures. Fable had fixed a bug the original human fix shipped with, and my tests marked it wrong. Plus: Anthropic's own system card shows the safety fallback hands attacked sessions to a weaker model.
The Agreement Nobody Gave
Silence can look like agreement when correcting an error would expose how someone knows better.
Packing Algorithms in C# From Boxes to Restaurant Bookings
You have a collection of things and somewhere to put them. Parcels into boxes. Images into a sprite sheet. Jobs onto machines. Meetings into a calendar. The awkward bit is that “there's enough space” doesn't necessarily mean everything will fit. Over the years…
Use Docker Sandboxes as Your Development Environment
Set up your development tools in Docker Sandboxes, control network access, and reuse your environment with snapshots and Dockerfile-based templates.
My problem with dates on the web
You might have noticed that there are absolutely no dates on this website. And that is because I have a real problem with them. I think this started with Youtube, I've always felt that since there is so much content constantly appearing, I shouldn't look at older videos. And this might be a valid point, because if I had to catch up with every video of every channel I like, I would never find time to watch the newer ones. But the problem is that I set my expiration date really early. Once a video is like a month old, it becomes pretty much unwatchable to me (Unless it's something I REALLY want
More review is not better review
Half the pull requests in our monolith at Buser were reaching main without a human reading them. I found that out the week I decided to tighten code review, and I learned more from what went wrong after. This is what I turned on, why I turned most of it off three days later, and how review works today, with models reading every PR and a human still signing it. Main had no reader The monolith gets around 263 pull requests a month. Before September 29, 48% of them had a human approval. The rest went in on green CI and good faith.