文章 en

Corrigibility should not be the only target

来源: LessWrong · 添加于昨天

Many people believe that corrigibility is sufficiently promising to be the primary alignment method people should work on. I outline here several reasons I think that’s not the case. First, it’s hard to imagine AI companies pivoting radically enough to produce AIs trained only for corrigibility. Even with near-superhuman AI-assisted research, presumably developers will know the time pressure and not be willing to try something radically different when their opponents may not. So the realistic choices we make are in worlds where corrigibility/obedience competes with object level values like in

#target

打开原文发现更多

常见问题

什么是 Corrigibility should not be the only target？

Corrigibility should not be the only target is a 文章 discovery curated from LessWrong. Many people believe that corrigibility is sufficiently promising to be the primary alignment method people should work on. I outline here several reasons I think that’s not the cas

如何访问或体验此内容？

You can experience this content directly on its original host (LessWrong) by clicking the "Open Original" button.

此内容来源于哪里？

Curated from LessWrong by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.

所有文化与思想发现 →

文章 · 文化与思想

This Next-Level Nonstick Cookware Set Is on Sale for Hundreds of Dollars Off Ahead of Black Friday

I personally can’t imagine my kitchen without nonstick cookware. But ever since I started learning about the PFAS and PTFEs (aka “forever chemicals”) that are sometimes used for nonstick coatings, I’ve been more intent on picking pots and pans that aren’t made with them. Forever chemicals can have adverse effects on our health, so for the sake of both my health and peace of mind, I’d rather not take a risk. READ MORE...

Kitchn | Inspiring cooks, nourishing homes 查看详情 →