文章 en

Higher salaries in AI safety

来源: LessWrong · 添加于昨天

The salaries are too damn low AI safety has a salary overhang. A bunch of people are paid way below their market rate. (Also true of EA, but I’ll lump them under “AI safety” for this piece). This has been getting a bit better, very recently — I hear about eg Redwood Research technical talent making ~$800k/y in salary. But when you compare this to the $10-100m/y comp packages for talent in labs, it still seems kind of low. And CG’s money cannon has fired very few shots to date — maybe ~15 orgs hit, see Trace — so the raises are still very unequally distributed. It’s not just rank-and-file emplo

打开原文发现更多

常见问题

什么是 Higher salaries in AI safety？

Higher salaries in AI safety is a 文章 discovery curated from LessWrong. The salaries are too damn low AI safety has a salary overhang. A bunch of people are paid way below their market rate. (Also true of EA, but I’ll lump them under “AI safety” for th

如何访问或体验此内容？

You can experience this content directly on its original host (LessWrong) by clicking the "Open Original" button.

此内容来源于哪里？

Curated from LessWrong by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.

所有文化与思想发现 →

文章 · 文化与思想

This Next-Level Nonstick Cookware Set Is on Sale for Hundreds of Dollars Off Ahead of Black Friday

I personally can’t imagine my kitchen without nonstick cookware. But ever since I started learning about the PFAS and PTFEs (aka “forever chemicals”) that are sometimes used for nonstick coatings, I’ve been more intent on picking pots and pans that aren’t made with them. Forever chemicals can have adverse effects on our health, so for the sake of both my health and peace of mind, I’d rather not take a risk. READ MORE...

Kitchn | Inspiring cooks, nourishing homes 查看详情 →