Argue about Risk Management Speed, not p(doom)
Source: LessWrong ·
This post is written in a personal capacity. All opinions expressed are solely those of the author. I. Executive Summary There’s a mismatch that I’d like to correct between: the reasons why superintelligence is dangerous, and the categories we use to describe how dangerous superintelligence is. The most important cluster of reasons why a superintelligent model is dangerous is that it (i) could quickly kill or impoverish billions of people, (ii) could be very different from its predecessors, and (iii) can’t easily be altered once it’s deployed or otherwise widely distributed. The combination of
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Argue about Risk Management Speed, not p(doom)?
Argue about Risk Management Speed, not p(doom) is a article discovery curated from LessWrong. This post is written in a personal capacity. All opinions expressed are solely those of the author. I. Executive Summary There’s a mismatch that I’d like to correct between: the re
How can I access or experience this?
You can experience this content directly on its original host (LessWrong) by clicking the "Open Original" button.
Where does this content come from?
Curated from LessWrong by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.
More like this
All Culture & ideas discoveries →Priyanka Kumar on Incorporating Art Into Her Nature Writing
On a snowy winter afternoon, a coyote was slipping out of the microwild around my home as I tried, without success, to get a good photograph. (I created the concept of the microwild while writing the book The Light Between
”Arabic Music,” a Poem by Mahmoud Darwish
“If only men were stones.” If only I were a stone… Whenever the eyes wander, Do these clouds, one by one, Put me to flight? When a sparrow scratches at the horizon Do I search for an idol? At each
How Neuroscience Can Give Paralyzed People The Chance to Speak Again
A young adult man with closely cropped dark brown hair sits in a wheelchair in a dimly lit room, facing a computer screen on which a simple phrase is typed out: “How are you today?” Underneath the question on the
Who Gets to Write About Ordinary Life?
We keep asking Sergey Davydov for a news report, but what he really wants to tell us is a love story. It would be to our advantage if we do it his way. His sophomore foray outside of theatre, Мидвест
Science Friction: An Argument for More Sex in Sci-Fi
This first appeared in Lit Hub’s Craft of Writing newsletter—sign up here. For centuries, sailors enduring months-long voyages would gaze out at sea mammals sunning themselves and think the thought as old as thought itself: “Would.” Even famously reliable Christopher
Lit Hub Daily: November 6, 2026
Katherine Kelaidis on Sergey Davydov and why stories of ordinary life are essential in times of political upheaval: “Hatred and division, the business of political conflict, are not the organizing principles of his inner world. Love is.” | Lit Hub