跳到内容
onsuggest
登录
文章 en

Gods of straight lines on graphs strike Starburst. I am shocked and puzzled.

来源: LessWrong ·

LLM Intelligence, measured by Starburst, has been basically linear over time since that start of the reasoning era. By Chapin Lenthall-Cleary and Cole Gaboriault In summer 2024, my friend Cole and I started a hobby research program into perceptions of (human) intelligence. We started by creating a bespoke 1-5 intelligence scale [1] and rating people we knew. Our plan was to then make a bunch of tests, give them to the people we rated, and see which tests, if any, correlated with our ratings. One of those tests was Starburst. We’ve talked about it before ; in short, it’s a puzzle game where one

什么是 Gods of straight lines on graphs strike Starburst. I am shocked and puzzled.?

Gods of straight lines on graphs strike Starburst. I am shocked and puzzled. is a 文章 discovery curated from LessWrong. LLM Intelligence, measured by Starburst, has been basically linear over time since that start of the reasoning era. By Chapin Lenthall-Cleary and Cole Gaboriault In summer 2024, my

如何访问或体验此内容?

You can experience this content directly on its original host (LessWrong) by clicking the "Open Original" button.

此内容来源于哪里?

Curated from LessWrong by the OnSuggest team to surface the most interesting and serendipitous content on the web.

文章 · 文化与思想

We urgently need to practice before we can pause

I've noticed two clusters of thought in how people expect a global AI pause to be shaped: Single-shot global pause : the global AI pause will be implemented suddenly, with little pacing precedent before it, and we will need to do a lot of research before it's implemented so that we can get it right the first time around. Incrementally-shaped global pause : the global AI pause will be implemented incrementally, with lots of pacing precedent before it, and we will improve the pause setup and get more parties to join in as we go. An incrementally-shaped global pause is both more likely and more t

LessWrong 查看详情 →
文章 · 文化与思想

Minimalism, Stuff, and Brains

Reading the comments on my post on junk I was surprised to see the extent to which people's relation to rarely used possessions varies. Some people forget rarely used possessions, and get minimal benefit from having them stored. When they need something, they don't know whether they already have it, and the effort to maintain an index [1] wouldn't be worth it. Ben writes : I end up with curtains I don't need. I decide to store them for the future in case they are helpful. Years pass. I need new curtains. I have forgotten the ones I kept, so I buy new ones and put them up. Months later I find t

LessWrong 查看详情 →

键盘快捷键

上一条发现
←P
下一条发现
→N
喜欢
L
不适合我
X
保存
S
显示此帮助
?
关闭
Esc

快捷键在发现页面上有效。