跳到内容
onsuggest
登录
文章 en

P(doom) is under-specified: EV(moral flourishing) & EV(utopia)

来源: LessWrong ·

It always bugs me when people use “P(doom)” instead of something more clearly specified like “P(AI takeover)”. But “P(AI takeover)” doesn’t feel great to me either, because we could avoid takeover and have a future that is extremely mediocre or even actively bad if S risks occur. Holden Karnofsky famously held a P(misaligned AI) of between 10% and 90% [1] . Depending on definition of P(doom), I could see myself anywhere in that range, partly because I’m indecisive, but partly because I don’t really know what P(doom) means. Ambiguous Scenarios: Doom or Not-Doom? Here are a few examples illustra

键盘快捷键

上一条发现
←P
下一条发现
→N
喜欢
L
不适合我
X
保存
S
显示此帮助
?
关闭
Esc

快捷键在发现页面上有效。