記事
en
P(doom) is under-specified: EV(moral flourishing) & EV(utopia)
情報源: LessWrong ·
It always bugs me when people use “P(doom)” instead of something more clearly specified like “P(AI takeover)”. But “P(AI takeover)” doesn’t feel great to me either, because we could avoid takeover and have a future that is extremely mediocre or even actively bad if S risks occur. Holden Karnofsky famously held a P(misaligned AI) of between 10% and 90% [1] . Depending on definition of P(doom), I could see myself anywhere in that range, partly because I’m indecisive, but partly because I don’t really know what P(doom) means. Ambiguous Scenarios: Doom or Not-Doom? Here are a few examples illustra
関連する発見
-
Is the First Amendment in Danger? PBS Documentary With NBC’s Tom Costello Examines Free Speech at a Crossroads
記事 · DocumentaryTube
-
Psychological Thriller ‘Games We Play’ Sets December Release, Unveils First Look
記事 · Bloody Disgusting
-
‘Scream 8’: Neve Campbell Confirms Her Return to Battle Ghostface
記事 · Bloody Disgusting
-
Cursed Drawings To Torment Woody Norman and Billie Piper in Supernatural Horror ‘Sketchbook’
記事 · Bloody Disgusting
-
‘Obsession’ Director Reveals the Hidden Detail “Nobody” Noticed That Makes Nikki More Disturbing
記事 · Bloody Disgusting
-
Avengers: Doomsday Ticket Presales Top Supergirl's Worldwide Box Office Run
記事 · Slashfilm