P(doom) is under-specified: EV(moral flourishing) & EV(utopia)
Fonte: LessWrong ·
It always bugs me when people use “P(doom)” instead of something more clearly specified like “P(AI takeover)”. But “P(AI takeover)” doesn’t feel great to me either, because we could avoid takeover and have a future that is extremely mediocre or even actively bad if S risks occur. Holden Karnofsky famously held a P(misaligned AI) of between 10% and 90% [1] . Depending on definition of P(doom), I could see myself anywhere in that range, partly because I’m indecisive, but partly because I don’t really know what P(doom) means. Ambiguous Scenarios: Doom or Not-Doom? Here are a few examples illustra
Altri simili
-
Is the First Amendment in Danger? PBS Documentary With NBC’s Tom Costello Examines Free Speech at a Crossroads
Articolo · DocumentaryTube
-
Psychological Thriller ‘Games We Play’ Sets December Release, Unveils First Look
Articolo · Bloody Disgusting
-
‘Scream 8’: Neve Campbell Confirms Her Return to Battle Ghostface
Articolo · Bloody Disgusting
-
Cursed Drawings To Torment Woody Norman and Billie Piper in Supernatural Horror ‘Sketchbook’
Articolo · Bloody Disgusting
-
‘Obsession’ Director Reveals the Hidden Detail “Nobody” Noticed That Makes Nikki More Disturbing
Articolo · Bloody Disgusting
-
Avengers: Doomsday Ticket Presales Top Supergirl's Worldwide Box Office Run
Articolo · Slashfilm